Purpose

This page has There may be comments or reviews or ratings. This is a reference, a part of my memory I have externalized. I have included the book-reading philosophy so a reader may decide how much my opinions might align with their own. And look, ma, I can refer to it from the Internet-enabled library.  :-)

Book-reading Philosophy

I don't like depressing art. That's not to say it is inherently bad, or that artists should not produce it. That's great, fine. However, for me, there is a cost to consuming such art (being depressed). Thus, the benefit of consuming (quality of the art) should outweigh the cost (any depression caused), or I am annoyed. Furthermore, one of the easier ways of creating dramatic tension is to be sad, so it seems like a cop-out to me. It is much harder to do great comedy; that is, comedy that actually makes me laugh (don't tell me about Moliere or South Park; barely a chuckle from either one). So, my ratings are slightly tilted away from depressing.

Also, I have found a couple of types of books I tend to like:

A note about my slant away from fiction, especially "great novels": the "universal truths" of "great novels" I find to be
inkblot tests. That is, the reader supplies much of the meaning, which is not inherently in the book. Such a book is complex, sophisticated, maybe enjoyable, but always ambiguous in order to allow multiple interpretations. Thus, it does not have "the meaning." I believe perhaps this ambiguity allows allows the meme (book) to survive better, for many reasons. People are intrigued by ambiguity, and will spread the meme while toying with it. Some of the many interpretations people will find personally important, and will (again) spread the meme. However, these are not necessarily "universal truths." The ambiguity that helps spread the meme is of value to the meme itself, not necessarily of value to me in my life. Indeed, they are often subjective, hence cannot be debated, only discussed. Endless discussion without any resolution I find irritating. That is called "philosophy."

Books I Want to Read (in no real order)

Books I've already read

These are rated and have brief comments. The ratings and reviews are not complete or comprehensive or even consistent. I wish they were so, but instead I decided not to work so hard. Some have comments. They are rated with the following system:

Of course, the ratings are slanted towards the top, for many reasons I'm sure. For example, I only tend to get books I think I'll like.

Books with the same rating value are a little bit ordered, but not always.

They are divided into

Nonfiction

Fiction

Religion (neither fiction or nonfiction)

Books I've read, but I have to get around to rating

  1. Crichton's book about someone accused of harrasment at work.
  2. Crichton's book about archeologists who travel back in time and the company that exploits them.  
  3. Hunt for Red October, Tom Clancy. Rauser says it has a good story.